
Rachel Kemp Senior Knowledge Lawyer
2024 AT A GLANCE
- The Planning and Development Act 2024 was signed into law in October.
- The EU Nature Restoration Law came into effect in August.
- The increasing possibility of conflicts arising between the application of established environmental law and measures aimed at addressing the climate emergency, specifically in the field of renewable energy, has led to some interesting judicial commentary.
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT
The Planning and Development Act 2024 (the Act) was passed by the Dáil on 9 October 2024 and signed into law by the President on 17 October 2024. It replaces the Planning and Development Act 2000 (the 2000 Act), and the vast amount of legislation that has amended it since.
The Act is 906 pages, divided into 26 parts, with seven schedules, and is the third largest piece of legislation enacted in the State’s history. Although now signed into law, only a handful of provisions are currently in force: Part 25 (which relates to Rent Pressure Zones), Part 26 (which relates to Owners' management companies and acquisition of certain NAMA assets), and sections 1-5 (which relate to short title and commencement, definitions, construction of certain references, orders and regulations). The remainder of the Act will need to be commenced by Ministerial orders. This is likely to happen in phases, as it did when the 2000 Act replaced the Local Government (Planning and Development) Act 1963. There will be some complexity in the meantime where elements of both the ‘old’ and ‘new’ planning law will apply. The Act includes “transitional provisions” which will be important in navigating this period of transition.
1. Plans, policies and related matters
Part 3 reflects one of the central aims of the Act – to move towards a more strategic, national, plan-led approach to development by emphasising the planning policy hierarchy to ensure consistency and integration of national and regional plans into the local planning process. The more strategic and long-term focus of the Act is reflected in a lengthening of the development plan cycle from six years to ten years.
2. Judicial review
The Act, in Part 9, makes some significant changes to judicial review (JR).
- Removal of the application for leave: Previously, individuals or organisations had to make an “application for leave” to seek JR, which acted as a preliminary screening stage. This requirement has now been removed.
- Limited appeals: Appeal from High Court decisions is limited to the Supreme Court only, and only if the case meets the constitutional criteria for entry to that court.
- Initiation of judicial review: To commence JR proceedings, an application must be made to the High Court by way of notice of motion, notifying relevant parties. The time-limit for bringing a JR remains the same (i.e. eight weeks from the date of the decision, the act, or the failure to perform a particular function).
- Applicant must provide a statutory declaration: To commence JR proceedings, an applicant must provide the High Court with a statutory declaration confirming that the proceedings are not brought for the purpose of either: (i) delaying the carrying out of any development or proposed development, or (ii) securing any payment to, or the doing of any other thing for the benefit of, any person.
- Standing requirements: The Act defines "sufficient interest" as being directly or indirectly materially affected by the matter. This is the starting point for determining standing. However, for certain environmental cases, such as those involving Environmental Impact Assessment or Appropriate Assessment, an applicant will be regarded as having a sufficient interest (regardless of direct or material impact) where they are: (i) companies with environmental protection as a main goal that have been active for at least a year, (ii) organisations with at least ten members and approval from their governing body to bring the JR, or (iii) individuals who made submissions “of a material nature” to the relevant body, in accordance with the requirements applicable to such submissions.
- The requirement on applicants to show “substantial grounds” has been dropped. Unincorporated bodies, like residents' associations, can bring a JR under specific conditions. The Act also introduces a stricter procedural focus for the amendment of pleadings and when JRs can be taken.
- Costs reforms: The Act introduces significant changes to costs in environmental legal proceedings. A pivotal feature of the Act is the establishment of the "environmental legal costs financial assistance mechanism," designed to support individuals or groups involved in environmental legal proceedings who do not fully win their cases. The details of this new legal costs regime will be set out in regulations, which have yet to be published. It is expected that the new JR provisions will not be commenced until that regime is in place.
3. An Coimisiún Pleanála
Part 17 of the Act provides for the re-structuring and re-organisation of An Bord Pleanála (the Board) under the new name of An Coimisiún Pleanála (the Commission). This entity will have broadly similar powers to the Board, with an increased focus on efficiency, compressed timelines for decision making, and transparency. The Act also introduces a number of provisions to strengthen the administrative functions and governance of the Commission. For example, the governing board or the CEO will be obliged to conduct reviews of the Commission’s organisation, procedures and decision-making functions every three years. It is anticipated that this Part will be commenced shortly to enable the establishment of the Commission.
4. New offence of requesting payments or benefits
Part 20 of the Act provides for a new criminal offence of requesting payments or benefits in exchange for not opposing a development, or for withdrawing opposition to a development. Requests made in good faith for compensation for loss of enjoyment of land, or a maritime site by an owner or occupier are, however, exempted.
5. Statutory declarations
The Act also introduces a new requirement for submissions, observations, appeals and JR proceedings to be accompanied by a statutory declaration that they are not being made, or taken, to delay the development or secure any benefits. Withdrawals of such submissions and proceedings must also be accompanied by a statutory declaration to the effect that they are not made to secure any benefits. Failure to comply with these requirements, or making false declarations, will be an offence.
THE EU NATURE RESTORATION LAW
The EU Nature Restoration Law (Regulation (EU) 2024/1991, the Regulation) entered into force on 18 August 2024. As a Regulation, it does not require implementing legislation within the Member States and is directly effective. The Regulation has been politically controversial since its proposal by the Commission in June 2022, with a number of knife-edge votes during the legislative process, including in the European Parliament and the Council of the EU.
The Regulation aims to restore degraded ecosystems across the EU to enhance biodiversity, combat climate change, and ensure the recovery of natural habitats and species. It sets legally binding targets for restoring degraded ecosystems and emphasises the importance of nature-based solutions for environmental sustainability. The Regulation outlines legally binding restoration measures for terrestrial, coastal, freshwater, marine, urban, agricultural, and forest ecosystems. By 2030, these restoration measures should cover at least 20% of the EU’s land and sea areas, and ultimately, by 2050, should cover all ecosystems in need of restoration.
Member States are required to prepare and implement national restoration plans to meet these targets. Ireland’s draft national restoration plan (the Plan) is to be provided to the European Commission by 1 September 2026. The National Parks & Wildlife Service is overseeing the work on the Plan and inter-departmental working groups will focus on three key thematic areas: land, sea, and towns and cities. An advisory committee has also been established, consisting of a chairperson and representatives from key sectors. The role of the advisory committee will be to provide advice and recommendations to the Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications (the Minister) on the content of Ireland’s Plan.
Article 6 provides that, for the purposes of the Regulation, renewable energy projects are presumed to be in the overriding public interest and may be exempted by Member States from certain requirements under the Regulation. Member States are also able to restrict such derogations geographically or limit them to certain types of technologies or projects, in line with national energy and climate plans. Any such restrictions must be reported to the European Commission and be justified by the Member State in question.
POLICY DEVELOPMENTS RELATING TO RENEWABLE ENERGY
There have been a number of recent policy changes at an EU level aimed at increasing the roll-out of renewable energy throughout the Member States, in an effort to reach the climate neutrality objective contained in the European Green Deal:
- In response to the war in Ukraine, and with the goal of phasing out Russian fossil fuel imports and accelerating the European Union’s transition to clean energy, the REPowerEU Plan was launched in May 2022.
- Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 laying down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy (the Permitting Regulation) was published as a temporary, emergency measure in December 2022 and was extended earlier this year.
- Directive (EU) 2023/2413 on the promotion of energy from renewable sources, known as ‘RED III’ entered into force in November 2023. Most of RED III's provisions require transposition into national law by May 2025. A shorter deadline of July 2024 applied to certain provisions related to the simplification and acceleration of permitting for renewable energy projects.
- The European Commission opened infringement proceedings against Ireland and 25 other Member States in September this year for failure to fully transpose these provisions of RED III. According to the Minister, speaking in the Dáil in October, a statutory instrument was at an “advanced stage” of drafting, which would give effect to the permitting provisions contained in RED III.
- With the transposition deadline for RED III looming, Ireland is still having difficulties with the transposition of its predecessor, RED II (Directive (EU) 2018/2001). Ireland has transposed RED II via various regulations from 2020-2023. However, in November 2024, the European Commission sent additional reasoned opinions to Ireland and three other Member States for their continuous failure to fully transpose the legislation. This follows the opening of infringement proceedings against Ireland and other Member States in 2021 for transposition failures in relation to RED II. Ireland now has two months to remedy the situation and notify the complete transposition of RED II to the European Commission or face a referral to the Court of Justice of the EU.
The Permitting Regulation and RED III both provide, in certain circumstances, for a presumption that renewable energy infrastructure is in the overriding public interest where the environmental impacts may have otherwise precluded development.
In a judgment of the Planning and Environment Court from September 2024 (Carrownagowan Concern Group & Ors v An Bord Pleanála [No.3] [2024] IEHC 549), Humphries J referred to recent EU developments as constituting “legally cognisable signposts” for courts in relation to the approach to be adopted to clashes between climate-related renewable energy goals and pre-existing European and national environmental and planning law. The Court recognised the “inherent urgency” associated with renewable energy projects and addressed the requirement set out in article 16(6) of RED III that litigation regarding such projects be afforded priority before the courts.
The Court stated that Practice Direction HC126 for the Planning and Environment List aims to reflect this priority with provision for automatic entry to the list for proceedings related to RED III (and in particular, renewable energy projects under article 16(6)). The Practice Direction also provides for an expedited procedure to apply by default to challenges to projects within RED III and that such projects can also be prioritised and assigned early hearing dates. In its judgment, the Court accepted that the “statutorily-supported policy in favour of expeditious and overriding provision of renewable energy” was relevant in the weighing up of the public interest in favour of renewable energy projects going ahead.
LOOKING AHEAD
- Planning and Development Act 2024: It will likely take several months before all sections of the Act are commenced and the new Planning and Development Regulations are introduced. The Minister for Housing recently commented that the Act may take up to two years to commence in full. We await a ‘comprehensive implementation strategy’ regarding the Act, which is expected to be published by the Department.
- The new Planning and Development Regulations will also require scrutiny once published and the detail of the new environmental legal aid costs regime is awaited with interest. The passing of the Act marks a significant milestone in the overhaul of the planning system, which the Government committed to deliver within its lifetime. However, it is inevitable with such substantial new legislation that there will be some complexity around its provisions, which will lead to issues being raised in cases in the future.
- EU Nature Restoration Law: Further details are awaited in relation to the approach to be adopted by Ireland as regards its Nature Restoration Plan, due to be delivered by September 2026. We await with particular interest details on any possible exemptions or derogations to be extended to renewable energy projects in the context of the Regulation.
- We are waiting to see how the recognised urgency regarding the climate crisis plays out further in judicial decision-making before the Irish courts, specifically in the field of renewable energy in light of the “legally cognisable signposts” for the courts emanating from the EU.
